2005 Eagle Vision vs. 2011 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC90 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo XC90 (240 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2005 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2005 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 585 kg more than 2005 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Eagle Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Eagle Vision | 2011 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Eagle | Volvo |
Model | Vision | XC90 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1783 mm |