2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Croma weights approximately 350 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Croma | 1953 Riley RM A | |
Make | Fiat | Riley |
Model | Croma | RM A |
Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2870 mm |