2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1962 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,909 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Fiat Croma (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Croma weights approximately 455 kg more than 1962 Lancia Flavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Croma | 1962 Lancia Flavia | |
Make | Fiat | Lancia |
Model | Croma | Flavia |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 42 L |