2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1962 Maserati Tipo 64
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Croma. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Croma weights approximately 965 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Because 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Croma | 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | |
Make | Fiat | Maserati |
Model | Croma | Tipo 64 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2210 mm |