2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Fiat Croma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Fiat Croma | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Croma | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2290 mm |
