2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane

To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Fiat Croma (138 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Croma weights approximately 275 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Fiat Croma 1967 Ford Fairlane
Make Fiat Ford
Model Croma Fairlane
Year Released 2005 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2197 cc 3930 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 122 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1585 kg 1310 kg
Vehicle Length 4760 mm 5110 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2960 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 68 L