2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1968 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,536 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Fiat Croma | 1968 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Fiat | Lincoln |
| Model | Croma | Continental |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 7536 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 209 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2980 mm |
