2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Croma. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Croma weights approximately 537 kg more than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Because 1972 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Fiat Croma (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Datsun 240Z. 1972 Datsun 240Z has automatic transmission and 2005 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2005 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Datsun 240Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Croma | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Fiat | Datsun |
Model | Croma | 240Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.6 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 11 L/100km |