2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Fiat Croma (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Croma weights approximately 663 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Fiat Croma (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Fiat Croma | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Croma | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2210 mm |
