2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Fiat Croma (138 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Fiat Croma (203 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Fiat Croma | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Croma | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 70.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2440 mm |
