2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 102 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Croma. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 45 kg more than 2005 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Fiat Croma. (320 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Croma | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Croma | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 407 Nm |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2490 mm |