2005 Fiat Croma vs. 1999 Renault Zo

To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Fiat Croma (138 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Croma weights approximately 10 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Fiat Croma. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 2005 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2005 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: