2005 Fiat Doblo vs. 2009 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Fiat Doblo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Fiat Doblo would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Rodius (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Doblo. (62 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Doblo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 814 kg more than 2005 Fiat Doblo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Fiat Doblo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Rodius (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Fiat Doblo. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Fiat Doblo. 2009 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 2005 Fiat Doblo has manual transmission. 2005 Fiat Doblo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Doblo | 2009 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Fiat | SsangYong |
Model | Doblo | Rodius |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1241 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.8 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.6 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |