2005 Fiat Idea vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Fiat Idea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Fiat Idea would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Fiat Idea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Idea. (102 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Idea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 270 kg more than 2005 Fiat Idea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Idea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Fiat Idea (260 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2005 Fiat Idea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Idea | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Idea | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.5 seconds | 7.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 61 L |