2005 Fiat Palio vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Fiat Palio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Riley Kestrel (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Palio. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 9 kg more than 2005 Fiat Palio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Riley Kestrel (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Fiat Palio. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Palio | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Fiat | Riley |
Model | Palio | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2380 mm |