2005 Fiat Panda vs. 1972 Matra-Simca M530
To start off, 2005 Fiat Panda is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M530 (71 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Panda. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M530 should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Panda.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Fiat Panda (255 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Matra-Simca M530. (128 Nm). This means 2005 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Matra-Simca M530.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Panda | 1972 Matra-Simca M530 | |
Make | Fiat | Matra-Simca |
Model | Panda | M530 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1248 cc | 1699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 128 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2570 mm |