2005 Fiat Punto vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane

To start off, 2005 Fiat Punto is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Punto. (60 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Punto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Park Lane weights approximately 510 kg more than 2005 Fiat Punto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Mercury Park Lane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Park Lane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Punto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (626 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 524 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Fiat Punto. (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Fiat Punto.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Fiat Punto 1967 Mercury Park Lane
Make Fiat Mercury
Model Punto Park Lane
Year Released 2005 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1297 cc 6990 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 60 HP 340 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 102 Nm 626 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 850 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 3870 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 3130 mm