2005 Fiat Stilo vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Fiat Stilo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Fiat Stilo (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 240 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Fiat Stilo. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Stilo | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Fiat | Triumph |
Model | Stilo | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1170 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 64 L |