2005 Fiat Stilo vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Fiat Stilo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Stilo. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 120 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Fiat Stilo. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Fiat Stilo | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Stilo | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1290 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
