2005 Fiat Stilo vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2005 Fiat Stilo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Fiat Stilo (94 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 220 kg more than 2005 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Fiat Stilo | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Stilo | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 40 L |