2005 Fiat Stilo vs. 1968 Mini MK II
To start off, 2005 Fiat Stilo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mini MK II would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Fiat Stilo (99 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1968 Mini MK II. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1968 Mini MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 656 kg more than 1968 Mini MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Fiat Stilo (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mini MK II. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mini MK II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Fiat Stilo | 1968 Mini MK II | |
| Make | Fiat | Mini |
| Model | Stilo | MK II |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 610 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2040 mm |
