2005 Ford Bantam vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Bantam (74 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 16 kg more than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Bantam. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Bantam. (111 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Bantam | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Bantam | CJ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1958 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2199 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1014 kg | 1030 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |
