2005 Ford Bantam vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,753 cc, 2005 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Bantam (59 HP @ 4550 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Bantam weights approximately 358 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Bantam (106 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Bantam will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Bantam | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Bantam | Herald |
Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1147 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4550 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 29 L |