2005 Ford Bantam vs. 1962 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Bantam (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. (56 HP @ 200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Simca Plein Ceil weights approximately 64 kg more than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Because 1962 Simca Plein Ceil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Bantam | 1962 Simca Plein Ceil | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Bantam | Plein Ceil |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1036 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 42 L |
