2005 Ford Bantam vs. 1979 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1979 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Bantam weights approximately 76 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1979 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Bantam. (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Bantam | 1979 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Bantam | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1036 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |