2005 Ford Bantam vs. 1979 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1979 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda RX-7 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (59 HP @ 4550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Bantam weights approximately 58 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1979 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda RX-7 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Bantam. (106 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Bantam | 1979 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Bantam | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2292 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1060 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |