2005 Ford Bantam vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,753 cc, 2005 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (61 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (59 HP @ 4550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Bantam weights approximately 218 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Bantam (106 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Bantam will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Bantam | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Bantam | Ronda |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1193 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 61 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4550 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2460 mm |
