2005 Ford Bantam vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,753 cc, 2005 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (59 HP @ 4550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Bantam weights approximately 48 kg more than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Bantam. (106 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Bantam | 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Bantam | Sigma |
Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4550 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1070 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |