2005 Ford Bantam vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (59 HP @ 4550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 87 kg more than 2005 Ford Bantam. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Bantam. (106 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Bantam | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Bantam | Apollo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4550 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1205 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |