2005 Ford Bantam vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (59 HP @ 4550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 547 kg more than 2005 Ford Bantam. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Bantam. (106 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Bantam. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Bantam has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Bantam will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Bantam | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Bantam | XJR |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 4196 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4550 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 525 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1665 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 85 L |