2005 Ford Bantam vs. 2002 Rover 25
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rover 25 would be higher. At 1,753 cc, 2005 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Rover 25 (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (59 HP @ 4550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Bantam weights approximately 98 kg more than 2002 Rover 25.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Rover 25 (110 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Bantam. (106 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Rover 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Bantam | 2002 Rover 25 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Bantam | 25 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1396 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1020 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |