2005 Ford Bantam vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 1,753 cc, 2005 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (59 HP @ 4550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Bantam weights approximately 284 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Bantam (106 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Bantam will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Bantam | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Bantam | R2 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 658 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 56 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 66.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 834 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 30 L |
