2005 Ford C-MAX vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus
To start off, 2005 Ford C-MAX is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2005 Ford C-MAX. (104 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford C-MAX.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford C-MAX. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford C-MAX | 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | C-MAX | Gaus |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
