2005 Ford C-MAX vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2005 Ford C-MAX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Subaru Forester. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Subaru Forester would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Forester weights approximately 138 kg more than 2005 Ford C-MAX.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru Forester (186 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford C-MAX. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford C-MAX | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | C-MAX | Forester |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 74.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2680 mm |