2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1961 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK X (261 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 473 kg more than 1961 Jaguar MK X.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK X (390 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 1961 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 1961 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-150 | MK X |
Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 390 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 106 mm |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 63 L |