2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1962 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1793 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 1962 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | E-150 | Elan |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 138 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 45 L |