2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1213 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | E-150 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |