2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1623 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-150 | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | E-150 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 66 L |
