2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1441 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-150 | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | E-150 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2210 mm |
