2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1463 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | E-150 | Ascona |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 102 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 73.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 70 L |