2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1992 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-150 | 1992 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | E-150 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2560 mm |
