2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (170 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | 626 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |