2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (108 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1318 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (137 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-150 | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2510 mm |