2005 Ford E-150 vs. 1997 Acura RL
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura RL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura RL would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1997 Acura RL. (205 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura RL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 708 kg more than 1997 Acura RL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura RL. (304 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-150 | 1997 Acura RL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | E-150 | RL |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3472 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 304 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |
