2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1703 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (70 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-150 | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | E-150 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Van | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 70 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 1810 mm |
