2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+ would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+. (75 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1408 kg more than 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+. (117 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-150 | 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | E-150 | Wagon R+ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 77 mm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 41 L |
