2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 988 kg more than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (193 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | E-150 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 193 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 57 L |