2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (232 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 73 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (434 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | E-150 | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 2310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 96 L |