2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 403 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (700 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E-150 | SL |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 700 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |