2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, both 2005 Ford E-150 and 2005 Volvo S40 were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2005 Volvo S40. (138 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 983 kg more than 2005 Volvo S40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volvo S40. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-150 | S40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2434 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 62 L |